Social Context and the KDP

Eva Holmes, CG®, AG
Dec 16, 2025
379 views
CC
SyllabusSyllabus
SyllabusSyllabus

About this webinar

Incorporating social context in a Kinship Determination Project isn’t just about weaving historical events and descriptions of daily life into a family narrative. Community and culture shape behavior and relationships. To understand and document our ancestors, we need to understand the society in which they lived. When we estimate a marriage date based the birth of a couple’s first child (or that the birth of a child implies a marriage), we base those assumptions on context. This lecture will explore social context and illustrate how to research and write about it within a Kinship Determination Project.

About the speaker

Eva Holmes, CG®, AG®, lives in Portland, Maine. She has published in several periodicals, including the National Genealogical Society Quarterly, Crossroads, and the Minnesota Genealogist. Eva is the a...
Learn more...

Key points and insights

This webinar, presented through the Board for Certification of Genealogists (BCG) and taught by Eva Holmes, makes a compelling case for treating social context as a research tool—not a decorative flourish. Using practical, story-driven examples, it shows how understanding the rules, expectations, and lived realities of a time and place can unlock better record choices, sharper analysis, and more convincing conclusions. While the session ties these ideas directly to the Kinship Determination Project (KDP) for certification applicants, the strategies are broadly relevant to anyone trying to solve identity problems, explain migrations, or interpret puzzling records with confidence.

  • Social context improves “reasonably exhaustive research” by expanding what counts as relevant evidence. Rather than stopping at the usual vital, census, and land records, the webinar demonstrates how factors like religion, mobility, inheritance customs, occupational risks, and household structure can point to overlooked sources—and explain why some records never existed in the first place.

  • Context prevents misreads and “presentism” when evidence looks strange by modern standards. Several examples highlight how easily today’s assumptions can distort interpretation—whether judging unusual marriages, misunderstanding coerced loyalty oaths, or reading legal and social penalties into records without recognizing the pressures behind them.

  • Better context creates stronger genealogical writing and a more persuasive KDP narrative. Adding the right historical and social details can make a conclusion feel inevitable because it clarifies why events unfolded as they did. The webinar also offers practical guidance for building that knowledge (scholarly articles, local and social-science journals, footnote mining, and strategic keyword searching—sometimes in the original language), while avoiding the trap of turning context into unsupported speculation.

Viewing the full webinar is well worth it for genealogists who want more than “names and dates”—especially those aiming to strengthen proof arguments, spot meaningful FAN-club connections, and write narratives that signal depth of research without drifting into guesswork. The session also encourages digging into the syllabus resources to keep learning efficiently; those curated materials can jump-start reading lists, sharpen search terms, and guide exploration of repositories and studies most likely to support the next research breakthrough.

Loading comments...

Related webinars

Using Homestead Records to Tell Your Ancestor’s Story
Play video00:59:25
James C. Ward’s Eldorado: A Coast to Coast Identity Case
Play video01:23:54
James C. Ward’s Eldorado: A Coast to Coast Identity Case
Cluster Research Using the FAN Principle (2025 Reisinger Lecture)
Play video00:55:09
Cluster Research Using the FAN Principle (2025 Reisinger Lecture)
Resolving Conflict: A Key to Sound Genealogical Conclusions (a 2025 Reisinger Lecture)
Play video00:54:54